This is for those people who have been considering this game, featuring Mickey teh Mouse.

Games Radar: 9/10
Official Nintendo Magazine UK: 8.5/10
GameTrailers: 8.2/10
IGN UK: 8/10
VideoGamer: 8/10
IGN: 8/10
Guardian: 8/10
Computer and Video Games: 7.5/10
1UP: 7.5/10
PALGN: 6.5/10
Eurogamer: 6/10

Current Metacritic average: 7.7 (11 reviews)

So far, some mixed reviews. Main problems seem to be mechanical flaws.
I might get this game, but I dunno.

Lol 7.7 is not mixed. 5.0 is mixed. These are positive. I like how they want to remove Mickey's childish image and i have heard it was one of the best games (maybe even the best) to be shown at this year's E3.
I will definitely try it out, but i am not really impressed.

Meh. the game looks meh overall. my friends described it as this super awesome thing but when i saw the trailer i wasnt that into it. :/

7.7? i call that a FAIL! anythin thats not 8 or higher is a fail...

Red Yoshi X wrote:7.7? i call that a FAIL! anythin thats not 8 or higher is a fail...

That's not a good way to judge a game >.>

Looks alright.

zmanrwks wrote:

Red Yoshi X wrote:7.7? i call that a FAIL! anythin thats not 8 or higher is a fail...

That's not a good way to judge a game >.>

fine zman... anythin below 7 is a fail

Red Yoshi X wrote:

zmanrwks wrote:

Red Yoshi X wrote:7.7? i call that a FAIL! anythin thats not 8 or higher is a fail...

That's not a good way to judge a game >.>

fine zman... anythin below 7 is a fail

Not the point. You really can't judge if something is fail unless you actually play it, or have good proof you think it's fail.

Yes, exactly. That really happened to me with Goldeneye. The critics were flawless, but i didn't like it.
You can't judge a game by it's covers. It all really depends on what genres you prefer the most.

It looks okay... but doesn't look like anything special, especially when every critic complained about the camera view, that doesn't make me want to pick it up anytime soon.